Investigations · Evidence and analysis

Follow the information.
Keep the limits clear.

Fraud investigations may involve records from different sources. A careful process identifies the question, records what was reviewed and separates observations from interpretation and conclusions.

Explore investigative capabilities

A structured approach

Questions first.
Conclusions last.

Work begins with what has been reported and what information is available. Depending on the defined scope, relevant records may be compared across communications, payment activity, public digital information and other sources.

Similar names, a transaction path or an online connection may be a lead to examine. It is not automatically proof of identity, ownership, intent or wrongdoing. Reports should make source and uncertainty visible.

How a fraud investigation may be scoped
An unbranded laptop, blank papers, notebooks and a pen on a quiet workspace desk.

Methods and information

Investigative capabilities

These pages describe possible areas of review. The work that is appropriate depends on available records, technical limits and the agreed question.

Published work

Research & published investigations

Research reports are published when their sources and conclusions can be presented clearly. The index identifies available reports and makes no claim of client casework.

Visit the research index

Evidence. Clarity. Response.

A lead is not a finding.

Information can be incomplete, inaccessible or open to more than one interpretation. No investigation can guarantee identification, asset recovery or a particular decision by an institution or authority.

FRN intelligence search

Search FRN resources,
investigations and guidance.

Search fraud types, guides, investigations, country pages and more.